<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why &#8220;Group&#8221; Interviews Don&#8217;t Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://selectingwinners.com/blog/hiring-advice-articles/why-group-interviews-dont-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://selectingwinners.com/blog/hiring-advice-articles/why-group-interviews-dont-work/</link>
	<description>Hiring Tools and Tips For Business owners, Managers and Executives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:05:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Clark</title>
		<link>http://selectingwinners.com/blog/hiring-advice-articles/why-group-interviews-dont-work/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selectingwinners.com/blog/?p=63#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Nice article. I am a professional sales person with over 27 years as an employee and manager. I was recently laid off from a company I had 12 years with. In 10 Month&#039;s I&#039;ve run across this &#039;group interview&#039; twice. As a former manager I would have never even thought of doing this. It takes away from the candidates to express themselves in many forms. 

The most recent was for a position as an admission&#039;s rep for a local private college. The interview seemed more about the interviewer than the candidates. The questions were almost un-related to the job. I cringed as one of the questions was &quot;What is your greatest achievement?&quot; That question cannot be answered as simply as a single achievement.The answer could be of a very personal nature as well as a professional achievement. Who would share a personal achievement with a group of condidates?

The person giving the interview talked, leaving little room for interection, and the question of why you think you&#039;d be qualified never entered the interview.

I found it very unprofessional and rude in many ways. I don&#039;t know where this idea originated but I can say that the process should be done away with. The interviewer mentioned it was &quot;cost effective&quot;. I almost laughed out loud. Cost effective measures in order to select the proper candidate? 

When I found myself looking for an employee I wasn&#039;t concerned with saving money. I was concerned I would get the right candidate for the position.

By the way, I was the most qualified of the group but was deemed &quot;over qualified&quot; whichis another term abused and over used. It is also an excuse to tell people they are &quot;too old&quot; which is another story altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. I am a professional sales person with over 27 years as an employee and manager. I was recently laid off from a company I had 12 years with. In 10 Month&#8217;s I&#8217;ve run across this &#8216;group interview&#8217; twice. As a former manager I would have never even thought of doing this. It takes away from the candidates to express themselves in many forms. </p>
<p>The most recent was for a position as an admission&#8217;s rep for a local private college. The interview seemed more about the interviewer than the candidates. The questions were almost un-related to the job. I cringed as one of the questions was &#8220;What is your greatest achievement?&#8221; That question cannot be answered as simply as a single achievement.The answer could be of a very personal nature as well as a professional achievement. Who would share a personal achievement with a group of condidates?</p>
<p>The person giving the interview talked, leaving little room for interection, and the question of why you think you&#8217;d be qualified never entered the interview.</p>
<p>I found it very unprofessional and rude in many ways. I don&#8217;t know where this idea originated but I can say that the process should be done away with. The interviewer mentioned it was &#8220;cost effective&#8221;. I almost laughed out loud. Cost effective measures in order to select the proper candidate? </p>
<p>When I found myself looking for an employee I wasn&#8217;t concerned with saving money. I was concerned I would get the right candidate for the position.</p>
<p>By the way, I was the most qualified of the group but was deemed &#8220;over qualified&#8221; whichis another term abused and over used. It is also an excuse to tell people they are &#8220;too old&#8221; which is another story altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
